Howard v. Howard The issues presented here are whether the trial court was clearly erroneous in its determination that Appellant was voluntarily underemployed, thereby justifying the trial court’s refusal to modify its prior child support order; and whether the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005, 11 U.S.C. Sections 523(a)(5) and (15), precludes...Read More
Since the Kentucky Supreme Court has accepted discretionary review, here is a digest of the Court of Appeals Opinion: LICHTENSTEIN V. BARBANEL CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 2007-CA-000509 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED: AFFIRMED PANEL: VANMETER PRESIDING; CLAYTON AND SPECIAL JUDGE KNOPF CONCUR COUNTY: JEFFERSON DATE RENDERED: 8/15/2008 Dad appealed TC’s entry of two income withholding orders, primarily...Read More
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok
