Tag

Case Law – Kentucky
C.A.W. and T.L.M. v. Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Commonwealth of Kentucky; B.L.M., an Infant, and S.M.M., an Infant, NO. 2012-CA-000875-ME Published: Affirming County: Jefferson FACTS:
Read More
Morgan v. Getter, 2012-CA-000655-ME Published:Affirming County: Campbell Ex-Wife appealed Family Court’s order granting Ex-Husband’s motion requesting that minor child relocate to reside with him in Florida. Facts:
Read More
Wolfe v. Wolfe, 2012-CA-000578-ME To Be Published:   Affirming   County:  Laurel Mom appeals denial of DVO on child’s behalf claiming that Kentucky Rules of Civil Procedure do not apply to DV proceedings and she was denied opportunity to offer proof during DV hearing. FACTS:
Read More
Hughes v. Hughes, 2012-CA-000077-ME Published:   Affirming   County:  Jefferson Ex-Husband appealed FC’s order denying his CR 60.02 to terminate child support for child not biologically related to him. FACTS:
Read More
Shafizadeh v. Shafizadeh, 2010-CA-000758-MR Issue:  jurisdiction, findings of fact, imputation of income, attorney fees, modification of child custody and timesharing, garnishments, CR 60.02 Published:   Affirming in Part, Reversing in Part, and Remanding County:  Jefferson In three separate appeals, Ex-Husband appealed numerous orders of FC. FACTS:
Read More
C.J.M. v. Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Commonwealth of Kentucky, in the interest of C.K.A., an infant No. 2012-CA-000590-ME and C.F.A. v. Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Commonwealth of Kentucky, in the interest of C.K.A., an infant No. 2012-CA-000591-ME Published: Opinion Affirming County: Garrard
Read More
Oakley v. Oakley, 2011-CA-001410-ME Published:   Striking Appellant’s Brief and Dismissing Appeal    County:  Laurel
Read More
Fortwengler v. Fortwengler, 2011-CA-0018933-MR and 2011-CA-002077-MR Published:   Affirming    County:  Jefferson Ex-Husband appealed FC’s order terminating his garnishment of maintenance payments to Wife for satisfaction of debt to Ex-Husband’s father as well as FC’s order denying Ex-Husband’s parents’ motion to be joined as parties to the dissolution action in order to collect the debt. FACTS:
Read More
1 26 27 28 29 30 75